Digital Twin-Enabled Low-Carbon Business Model Innovation and ESG Outcomes: Evidence from Asian Manufacturing Cases
全文
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68322/ajsid.50关键词:
digital twin, low-carbon business model innovation, ESG outcomes, dynamic capabilities, Asian manufacturing摘要
Digital twins are now used for more things than before, not only engineering design and maintenance. In many factories, it is being integrated with energy systems, product development tools, and supply chain platforms. However, a factory can be highly digital, yet its business model may remain largely unchanged. This paper examines this problem through three manufacturing cases in Asia: Haier interconnected washing-machine factory in Qingdao, Siemens Chengdu plant, and LG Smart Park in Changwon. Dynamic capabilities theory and natural-resource-based view are used to explain the cases. The analysis mainly looks at what information the twin provides, how managers use this information, what routines are changed, and whether the change affects customer value, delivery activities, or the way economic returns are captured. The three companies do not follow a single path. Haier put digital information into order-driven mass customization. Siemens connects factory and product twins with eco-design and internal testing of solutions. LG first builds flexible production, then some practices are copied to other plants, and later part of this capability is sold to outside customers. The strongest evidence concerns energy, carbon emissions, materials, and waste. Social and governance evidence is more uneven, as it depends heavily on work arrangements, data rules, and management. The cases show that a digital twin alone is not sufficient. It requires complementary investment, organizational change, and sufficiently reliable data; otherwise, low-carbon business model change and ESG outcomes are difficult to confirm. Also, better production efficiency does not always mean better ESG outcomes in the long term.
参考
1.George, G.; Merrill, R.K.; Schillebeeckx, S.J.D. Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Entrep. Theory Pract 2021, 45, 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
2.Palmié, M.; Aebersold, A.; Oghazi, P.; Pashkevich, N.; Gassmann, O. Digital-Sustainable Business Models: Definition, Systematic Literature Review, Integrative Framework and Research Agenda from a Strategic Management Perspective. Int. J. Manage. Rev 2025, 27, 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12380
3.Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
4.Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
5.Wagner, R.; Kabalska, A. Sustainable Value in the Fashion Industry: A Case Study of Value Construction/Destruction Using Digital Twins. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 31, 1652–1667. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2474
6.Cimino, C.; Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L. Review of Digital Twin Applications in Manufacturing. Comput. Ind 2019, 113, 103130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130
7.Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Parekh, H.; Mani, V.; Belhadi, A.; Sharma, R. Digital Twin for Sustainable Manufacturing Supply Chains: Current Trends, Future Perspectives, and an Implementation Framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 176, 121448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121448
8.Bocken, N.M.P.; Short, S.W.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. J. Clean. Prod 2014, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
9.Geissdoerfer, M.; Vladimirova, D.; Evans, S. Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review. J. Clean. Prod 2018, 198, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
10.Lu, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhu, B.; Sun, Y. Digitalization Transformation and ESG Performance: Evidence from China. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2024, 33, 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
11.VanDerHorn, E.; Mahadevan, S. Digital Twin: Generalization, Characterization and Implementation. Decis. Support Syst. 2021, 145, 113524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524
12.Timperi, M.; Kokkonen, K.; Hannola, L. Digital Twins in Product-Service Lifecycles: A Framework Proposal for Enhancing Competitiveness and Sustainability in Manufacturing Business. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024, 37, 1444–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2023.2264814
13.Werner, A.; Schuseil, F.; Hämmerle, M.; Schaper, S.; Hölzle, K. Modular Digital Twin: An Approach for Generating and Exploiting Product Sustainability Information towards Service-Oriented Business Models. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2025, 63, 992–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2366997
14.Foss, N.J.; Saebi, T. Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? J. Manage. 2017, 43, 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927
15.Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plann. 2010, 43, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
16.Adelsberger, R.T.; Antons, O.; Arlinghaus, J. Digital Twins and Their Implications for Business Models: Overview and Potentials. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2024, 58, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.09.246
17.Teece, D.J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strateg. Manage. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
18.Hart, S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
19.Eisenhardt, K.M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
20.Eisenhardt, K.M.; Graebner, M.E. Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Acad. Manage. J. 2007, 50, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
21.Haier. Keeping Pace with Smart Manufacturing — A Visit to the Production Lines of Haier Qingdao Washing-Machine Connected Factory. 2024. Available online: https://www.haier.com/press-events/news/20240403_236928.shtml (accessed on 3 September 2026).
22.Otten, C. How Siemens Chengdu Became Our Second Sustainability Lighthouse. Siemens Blog, 2023. Available online: https://blog.siemens.com/2023/12/how-siemens-chengdu-became-our-second-sustainability-lighthouse/ (accessed on 3 September 2026).
23.World Economic Forum. Factories of the Future Show How to Apply AI to Benefit People, Planet and Performance. 2023. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/press/2023/12/factories-of-the-future-show-how-to-apply-ai-to-benefit-people-planet-and-performance/ (accessed on 3 September 2026).
24.World Economic Forum. Why Manufacturers Should Use Digital Twins for Sustainability not Just Productivity. 2023. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/05/digital-twins-manufacturing-sustainability/ (accessed on 3 September 2026).
25.LG Electronics. LG Smart Park Named ‘Lighthouse Factory’ for Futuristic Manufacturing Technology. 2022. Available online: https://www.lg.com/us/press-release/lg-smart-park-named-lighthouse-factory-futuristic-manufacturing-technology (accessed on3 September 2026).
26.LG Electronics. The Future of Manufacturing: Lighthouse Factory, LG Smart Park. 2022. Available online: https://www.lg.com/global/newsroom/lg-story/beyond-news/the-future-of-manufacturing-lighthouse-factory-lighting-the-way-ahead-lg-smart-park/ (accessed on 3 September 2026).
27.LG Electronics. LG Advances B2B Ventures With Cutting-Edge Lighthouse Factory Expertise. LG Global Newsroom, 2024. Available online: https://www.lg.com/global/newsroom/news/corporate/lg-advances-b2b-ventures-with-cutting-edge-lighthouse-factory-expertise/ (accessed on 3 September 2026).
已出版
期次
栏目
许可协议
版权所有 (c) 2026 Yuzhang Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
